DIVERSITY EQUITY INCLUSION
Collectively developing a code of conduct to enhance the quality of Arctic PASSION’s work by embracing diversity, equity and inclusion
Our Ambition
Together, we have a unique opportunity to build a more inclusive polar research community. We already benefit from global frameworks centred on international collaboration, and from progress towards greater inclusion of a number of historically marginalised groups. From here, polar research will become stronger if we address intersecting barriers faced by members and would-be members of our fields. Polar research is poised to benefit from a tremendous diversity of ideas and approaches – but only if we commit ourselves to understanding and addressing overlapping, interconnected barriers to equality.1
It is our ambition to embrace diversity and gender equality as a prerequisite for excellence within Arctic PASSION. By doing so the scientific performance as well as its human interactions within and outside the project will be enhanced. We expect every project participant to understand and support this ambition. Inclusiveness and co-creation are key concepts of our joint project. This code of conduct will be a living document that will develop based on our lessons learned as the project progresses.
Pro-active quality increase by striving at diversity and gender balance
It is well known that diversity and inclusion lead to better decision-making outcomes. For this reason, it is the desire of Arctic PASSION to proactively support diversity, inclusion and gender equity whenever possible, especially with actions of the project and its participants. This implies, for example, that each participant when recruiting, organizing meetings, workshops or panel discussions publish, disseminate, or produce outreach, will make a genuine attempt to be inclusive and ensure diverse representation of participants or contributors.
We are aware that this ambition will require us to be proactive about inclusiveness and diversity, rather than being passive and waiting for others to include themselves. Panels or workshops for example should be sought to not be composed by one gender, scientific or cultural background.
Building a more diverse and inclusive future
Such strategies will not only be demanded by future research programs (e.g., Horizon Europe2 ). In addition, our documented experiences and lessons learned will be useful for our and other’s future Arctic projects, and for the process of building a societally useful Arctic observing system, the main objective of Arctic PASSION.
Two domains of action in Arctic PASSION
Enhanced quality by diversity and gender balance in Arctic PASSION will become relevant in two domains of action:
Despite our efforts, mistakes may be made
Building a more inclusive and diverse programme of research, such as Arctic PASSION, is not an easy task and mistakes may be made by all of us; this learning process is part of making progress. The priority is how we learn from these mistakes. The steps undertaken and the lessons learned regarding diversity and gender equality, as well as the overall Ethics topics, will be part of the regular internal reporting, and will be summarized on a 6-monthly basis as an item of the template for our mandatory reporting.
Persons and boards of contact
Arctic PASSION encourages participants making use of the opportunity to approach the coordinator, members of the Lead Team, or the project’s Ethic Board to provide ideas for improvement or help for solving potential conflicts. An early approach has a higher potential to arrive at a fruitful outcome.
Summary: Guidelines/code of conduct for all Arctic PASSION participants
Acknowledgement
This guide was developed by the co-PIs of Arctic PASSION with several rounds of input from Women of the Arctic, Women in Polar Science, APECS, and the APPLICATE project. The document was reviewed by the Arctic PASSION Scientific Advisory Board and all project participants.
Literature
References
Further resources
Other references
- Gewin, V., 2021. How to blow the whistle on an academic bully. Nature 593, 299-301 (2021).
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Viglione, G., 2020. Racism and harassment are common in field research — scientists are speaking up. Nature 585, 15-16 (2020).